Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good

From: David Lang <david(at)lang(dot)hm>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Nunes Melo <al_nunes(at)atua(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good
Date: 2006-08-09 16:20:55
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.62.0608090920210.9699@qnivq.ynat.uz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>>> even many of the companies that offer support for postgres have this
>>> problem. the explination is always that they can't test every distro out
>>> there so they pick a few and support those (this is one of the reasons why
>
> Ahh and which companies would these be? As a representative of the most
> prominent one in the US I can tell you that you are not speaking from a
> knowledgeable position.

note I said many, not all. I am aware that your company does not fall into
this catagory.

David Lang

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2006-08-09 16:26:21 Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000
Previous Message David Lang 2006-08-09 16:19:53 Re: Hardware upgraded but performance still ain't good