| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Weberhofer GmbH <office(at)weberhofer(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Installation trouble - Solved |
| Date: | 2005-12-17 18:28:42 |
| Message-ID: | 43A458DA.7000404@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>Yes, I think the only official PGDG stuff is source. The binaries are
>done by port-specific teams. PGDG doesn't deal with MSI installer
>issues, or RPM issues, only the port-specific teams do. I know I don't
>read any RPM emails and any MSI issues are dealt with by the Win32
>people.
>
>
Bruce using that methodology the website would not be official PGDG.
Hackers don't
deal with specific website issues, on the website team does.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-17 18:31:08 | Re: DBlink documentation |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-17 18:03:10 | Re: Installation trouble - Solved |