| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Weberhofer GmbH <office(at)weberhofer(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Installation trouble - Solved |
| Date: | 2005-12-17 18:03:10 |
| Message-ID: | 200512171803.jBHI3Ao21368@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >The distinction is that RPMs and pginstaller are port-specific, binary
> >distributions.
> >
> >
> So they can't be considered official port releases for the PGDG? They
> are not "forks".
> Or, are you saying that the only official PGDG release is the source?
Yes, I think the only official PGDG stuff is source. The binaries are
done by port-specific teams. PGDG doesn't deal with MSI installer
issues, or RPM issues, only the port-specific teams do. I know I don't
read any RPM emails and any MSI issues are dealt with by the Win32
people.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-12-17 18:28:42 | Re: Installation trouble - Solved |
| Previous Message | Andre Truter | 2005-12-17 18:02:04 | Re: DBlink documentation |