Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
Date: 2005-12-02 15:55:13
Message-ID: 43906E61.5050008@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Magnus Hagander wrote:

>>BTW, has anyone checked Command Prompt's Subversion
>>repository? It's a mirror of our anonymous CVS (AFAICT).
>>I'm using it for reading diffs lately, and it's much nicer to
>>look at the whole patch as a single diff rather than going a
>>single file at a time.
>>
>>http://projects.commandprompt.com/projects/public/pgsql/browser/trunk/pgsql
>>
>>It has the additional advantage over our current CVSweb that
>>it's set with tabs to 4 spaces, so it looks just like our
>>code is supposed to ...
>>
>>
>
>Yes, and I for one love it :-)
>
>Now if I could just access the actual svn repository as well, I'd be
>even happier...
>
>
>
>

I have added it to the set of useful links on pgfoundry's front page.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-12-02 16:17:02 Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-12-02 15:02:14 Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?