| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Seneca Cunningham <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Date: | 2005-12-02 15:02:14 |
| Message-ID: | 439061F6.2020202@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>
>>I trimmed it down to:
>> --with-prefer-libedit prefer libedit over readline
>>
>>
>
>OK, I can live with that.
>
>
>
>
I think it's ugly. Can't we just say --prefer-libedit ?
If must be a --with-foo flag, maybe --with-libedit-preferred or
--with-libedit-first would be better.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cristian Prieto | 2005-12-02 15:12:15 | Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2005-12-02 14:55:09 | Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-02 15:55:13 | Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 14:14:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2005-12-02 17:14:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 14:14:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |