Re: user-friendliness improvement of pageinspect

From: "Yang Jie" <yonj1e(at)163(dot)com>
To: "Peter Geoghegan" <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: user-friendliness improvement of pageinspect
Date: 2018-07-11 01:55:17
Message-ID: 4341d68e.25a0.164870cc33b.Coremail.yonj1e@163.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simple queries are fine, but pageinspect can query previous data. If you return the same result as a simple query, this is similar to the oracle flashback version query.

On 7/11/2018 09:51，Peter Geoghegan<pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote：
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Yang Jie <yonj1e(at)163(dot)com> wrote:
my question is not split the data into individual attributes.
I want to see the data in the table, but I don't want to be a bytea type.

What's wrong with simply using an SQL query?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-07-11 01:55:19 Re: no partition pruning when partitioning using array type
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-07-11 01:51:11 Re: user-friendliness improvement of pageinspect