Re: user-friendliness improvement of pageinspect

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Yang Jie <yonj1e(at)163(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: user-friendliness improvement of pageinspect
Date: 2018-07-11 02:08:46
Message-ID: CAH2-WznZQhuFpPLNWvH-BbMqiPgUJ7CYCCNQppsKoHH0zL01ZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Yang Jie <yonj1e(at)163(dot)com> wrote:
> Simple queries are fine, but pageinspect can query previous data. If you
> return the same result as a simple query, this is similar to the oracle
> flashback version query.

Please don't top-post.

That may be true in some limited sense, but querying old data like
that seems totally impractical. You might do something like that for
forensic purposes, as a once off thing, but you didn't say anything
about your high level goals here.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ideriha, Takeshi 2018-07-11 02:20:40 RE: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-07-11 01:58:18 Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query