Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Subject: Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Date: 2025-07-13 19:47:18
Message-ID: 42E87B13-6240-4A3A-B242-FFD69EA41DDC@justatheory.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul 13, 2025, at 15:43, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I'm still liking the in-tree-file idea better. For one thing,
> it's not clear how expensive it'd be to search the git metadata
> for this other stuff.

How bout we keep it a simple as possible to start with: make it either the last tag in the branch or else the first commit in the branch (the branch commit). Except for master, in which case perhaps since the last time a branch was created?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-07-13 20:00:10 Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-07-13 19:43:08 Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project