Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Subject: Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Date: 2025-07-13 19:43:08
Message-ID: 442914.1752435788@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> writes:
> On Jul 13, 2025, at 15:02, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Alternatively, does git have any kind of metadata that isn't
>> a tag but acts sort of like one?

> Notes?
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-notes

Hmm, maybe. I recall discussion about starting to use notes
to amend commit messages, and I'm not sure if this usage would
conflict with that. At the very least we'd need to write a
specification for what a note that triggers ABI-check behavior
looks like.

I'm still liking the in-tree-file idea better. For one thing,
it's not clear how expensive it'd be to search the git metadata
for this other stuff.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2025-07-13 19:47:18 Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Previous Message Soumyadeep Chakraborty 2025-07-13 19:28:11 Re: Improve CRC32C performance on SSE4.2