Re: Vacuum summary?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum summary?
Date: 2005-07-11 19:38:05
Message-ID: 42D2CA9D.7090501@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>>What do you guys think of having a vacuum summary command? E.g.;
>
>
>>VACUUM [FULL] [ANALYZE] SUMMARY
>
>
> ... that will turn SUMMARY into a fully reserved word ...

Hmmm... good point. Other options would be:

brief
short
terse?
nutshell ;)
review
report -- This one is interesting although sufffers from the same problem.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-07-11 21:00:14 Re: thousands comma numeric formatting in psql
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-07-11 19:36:12 Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?