Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible better pg_ctl start/stop handling?
Date: 2005-07-11 19:36:12
Message-ID: 42D2CA2C.40107@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>>>Does the dev machine run more than one postmaster?
>
>
>>No.
>
>
> Hmm, it should be pretty impossible to see this if the machine's just
> been rebooted

It wasn't a reboot it was a total power loss and then startup.

and there are no other postmasters running. If you can
> replicate it, could you send along the output of "ipcs -m -a" along
> with the contents of the postmaster.pid file?

I will give it a shot a little later today.

Also, what's the platform
> exactly?

FC3.

J

>
> regards, tom lane

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-07-11 19:38:05 Re: Vacuum summary?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-07-11 19:21:35 Re: Vacuum summary?