| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum summary? |
| Date: | 2005-07-12 06:47:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1121150862.3970.98.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 12:38 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >>What do you guys think of having a vacuum summary command? E.g.;
> >
> >
> >>VACUUM [FULL] [ANALYZE] SUMMARY
> >
> >
> > ... that will turn SUMMARY into a fully reserved word ...
>
> Hmmm... good point. Other options would be:
>
> brief
> short
> terse?
> nutshell ;)
> review
> report -- This one is interesting although sufffers from the same problem.
>
Good idea. I think its a good idea to make that info easily accessible.
How about putting this in the logfile, without any command changes?
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-07-12 06:53:11 | CONCURRENT INDEXing again (was: Must be owner to truncate?) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-07-12 03:29:20 | Re: thousands comma numeric formatting in psql |