| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bgwriter changes |
| Date: | 2004-12-15 17:22:14 |
| Message-ID: | 41C072C6.5070606@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/15/2004 12:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> Still, we need to avoid scanning over all the clean blocks of a large
>> buffer pool, so there is need for a separate dirty-LRU.
>
> That's not happening, unless you want to undo the cntxDirty stuff,
> with unknown implications for performance and deadlock safety. It's
> definitely not happening in 8.0 ;-)
Sure not.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-12-15 17:24:57 | Re: production server down |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-15 17:17:37 | Re: production server down |