| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: production server down |
| Date: | 2004-12-15 17:24:57 |
| Message-ID: | 41C07369.6030405@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> I don't trust it at all. So does that imply that I should override
>> next transaction id and WAL starting address per the manpage?
>
> Yes, override everything there's a switch for. Also check that the
> other values shown by pg_controldata look reasonable (the locale
> settings are probably the only ones you might get burned on).
OK
>>> What if anything have you got in $PGDATA/pg_xlog?
>>
>> -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Dec 13 15:39
>> 0000016500000077
>
> Um. That's so far from the values shown in pg_control that it's not
> funny.
>
> This is 7.4, right?
Correct.
> I have a crude xlog dump tool that I'll send you off-list. We should
> be able to identify the latest checkpoint in the existing XLOG files,
> and that will give you something to work with.
Thanks,
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2004-12-15 17:28:36 | Re: production server down |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-12-15 17:22:14 | Re: bgwriter changes |