Re: bgwriter changes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bgwriter changes
Date: 2004-12-15 17:10:10
Message-ID: 2658.1103130610@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Still, we need to avoid scanning over all the clean blocks of a large
> buffer pool, so there is need for a separate dirty-LRU.

That's not happening, unless you want to undo the cntxDirty stuff,
with unknown implications for performance and deadlock safety. It's
definitely not happening in 8.0 ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-12-15 17:12:21 Re: production server down
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2004-12-15 17:06:46 Re: postgresql-7.4.5