Re: pg_dump bug fixing

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug fixing
Date: 2004-07-19 01:22:21
Message-ID: 40FB224D.7020800@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>No, because pg_dump itself dumps template1's contents...
>
> Are you planning on extending this line of thought to other things in
> template1 such as operators?

Ah, I see where you are going with this....

I think that we should treat the public schema specially :) That's
because it is much more likely to be dropped and messed with than the
other system objects, in fact you're encouraged to drop it in the docs.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-07-19 01:23:36 Re: Toward better documentation
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-07-19 00:30:45 function return type