Re: Toward better documentation

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Toward better documentation
Date: 2004-07-19 01:23:36
Message-ID: 40FB2298.101@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Pros:
> * Accomodates different learning styles
> * Jump-starts development by providing working code
> * Built-in tests for breakage of backward compatibility
>
> Cons:
> * Start-up costs re: actually writing & checking the examples
> * Bigger document base to update & maintain
> * Disk space
>
> What do you all think?

Sounds really great :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-07-19 01:24:55 Re: Toward better documentation
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-07-19 01:22:21 Re: pg_dump bug fixing