Re: improved DefElem list processing

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: improved DefElem list processing
Date: 2016-08-05 15:24:45
Message-ID: 392d0dfb-20af-0a3a-9d86-5e87dbc57d88@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/4/16 2:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> +1 on the general idea, but I wonder if it's a problem that you replaced
> an O(N) check with an O(N^2) check. I don't think there are any commands
> that would be likely to have so many options that this would become a
> serious issue, but ...

I'll run some tests.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-08-05 15:25:34 Re: improved DefElem list processing
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-08-05 15:23:37 Re: handling unconvertible error messages