Re: [PATCH] Several refactorings for pg_dump

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Several refactorings for pg_dump
Date: 2026-08-24 12:36:06
Message-ID: 3F77B531-7FB5-49AB-8841-2AC960D8952E@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 22 Aug 2026, at 01:52, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 08:28:52AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Seems reasonable. Are there any consumers of the buffer who hardcode an
>> assumption of its size which could use .lookaheadSize instead? I'll revist
>> this on Sunday when I get back in the office unless beaten to it.
>
> Please feel free to not wait for me. Thanks!

Committed, thanks.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2026-08-24 12:42:59 Re: How to best find unexpected WARNINGs in the TAP tests?
Previous Message David Rowley 2026-08-24 12:35:31 Re: apply worker misses closing partition leaves