Re: [PATCH] Several refactorings for pg_dump

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Several refactorings for pg_dump
Date: 2026-08-21 23:52:46
Message-ID: aojkzhNhUlRj2oai@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 08:28:52AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Seems reasonable. Are there any consumers of the buffer who hardcode an
> assumption of its size which could use .lookaheadSize instead? I'll revist
> this on Sunday when I get back in the office unless beaten to it.

Please feel free to not wait for me. Thanks!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuya Kawata 2026-08-22 00:58:37 Re: [PATCH] Fix compilation of nodeMergejoin.c with EXEC_MERGEJOINDEBUG
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-08-21 23:47:30 Re: Thread-safe stringToNode() / pg_strtok()