Re: Possible inaccurate description of wal_compression in docs

From: Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible inaccurate description of wal_compression in docs
Date: 2025-08-11 17:05:26
Message-ID: 3E8D902C-8C5E-49B1-B3DF-F64ECE7FB2D8@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi~

> FPWs are used here and there in a lot of places, like "FPI for hint". And indexes are build using FPI for many years, it did not start with 17...

Yeah, my fault. Creating index prior to v17 was also using log_newpages.

—
Regards, Jingtang

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doruk Yilmaz 2025-08-11 17:11:34 Re: [Patch] add new parameter to pg_replication_origin_session_setup
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2025-08-11 17:02:59 Re: Obsolete comments in ResultRelInfo struct