Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date: 2002-01-22 15:59:44
Message-ID: 3C4D8C70.5000309@pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> The above is the BSD license, the classic open-source license. It has no
> restrictions on how the source code may be used. We like it and have no
> intention of changing it.

Much better. I personally think that mentioning the historical
connection (i.e. code developed at Berkeley, released under BSD) would
help quelch the "why not change?" questions. At least I think it makes
a simple answer to such questions. If someone doesn't think that it is
important to respect the license under which the early developers
released their code, that's a clue that they're not clueful enough to
bother talking to, isn't it?

--
Don Baccus
Portland, OR
http://donb.photo.net, http://birdnotes.net, http://openacs.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2002-01-22 16:01:39 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Ned Wolpert 2002-01-22 15:55:25 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2002-01-22 16:01:39 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Ned Wolpert 2002-01-22 15:55:25 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL