| From: | Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Date: | 2002-01-22 15:55:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1011714925.3517.33.camel@osti.knowledgenet.corp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 19:32, Don Baccus wrote:
> Which wasn't my point, see above. There's no license disincentive. I
> didn't argue that there's a license *incentive* working in the GPL's favor.
From what you were saying, it sounded like you were comparing releasing
products on Linux vs. xxxBSD was related to how the OS's were licensed.
Now I understand that you weren't meaning to say that.
--
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Baccus | 2002-01-22 15:59:44 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-01-22 15:42:36 | Re: PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Baccus | 2002-01-22 15:59:44 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |
| Previous Message | Chris Humphries | 2002-01-22 15:50:48 | TODO question and claim |