Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date: 2002-01-22 16:11:27
Message-ID: 1011715887.1318.36.camel@osti.knowledgenet.corp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 08:59, Don Baccus wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>
> > The above is the BSD license, the classic open-source license. It has no
> > restrictions on how the source code may be used. We like it and have no
> > intention of changing it.
>

Works for me. Can a vote be cast and we be done with it?

--

Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>

D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2002-01-22 16:18:24 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Justin Clift 2002-01-22 16:06:05 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-22 16:16:11 Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Previous Message Justin Clift 2002-01-22 16:06:05 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL