Re: Add statistics to pg_stat_wal view for wal related parameter tuning

From: Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: lchch1990(at)sina(dot)cn
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add statistics to pg_stat_wal view for wal related parameter tuning
Date: 2020-11-16 09:24:10
Message-ID: 3599412d5f3eee44e3658e81d3790f6a@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-11-13 12:32, lchch1990(at)sina(dot)cn wrote:
>> Now, pg_stat_wal supports reset all informantion in WalStats
>> using pg_stat_reset_shared('wal') function.
>> Isn't it enough?
> Yes it ok, sorry I miss this infomation.

OK.

>>> 3. I do not think it's a correct describe in document for
>>> 'wal_buffers_full'.
>
>> Where should I rewrite the description? If my understanding is not
>> correct, please let me know.
> Sorry I have not described it clearly, because I can not understand
> the meaning of this
> column after I read the describe in document.
> And now I read the source code of walwrite and found the place where
> 'wal_buffers_full'
> added is for a backend to wait a wal buffer which is occupied by other
> wal page, so the
> backend flush the old page in the wal buffer(after wait it can).
> So i think the origin decribe in document is not so in point, we can
> describe it such as
> 'Total number of times WAL data written to the disk because a backend
> yelled a wal buffer
> for an advanced wal page.
>
> Sorry if my understand is wrong.

Thanks for your comments.

You're understanding is almost the same as mine.
It describes when not only backends but also other backgrounds
initialize a new wal page,
wal buffer's space is already used and there is no space.

> 'Total number of times WAL data written to the disk because a backend
> yelled a wal buffer for an advanced wal page'

Thanks for your suggestion.
I wondered that users may confuse about how to use "wal_buffers_full"
and how to tune parameters.

I thought the reason which wal buffer has no space is
important for users to tune the wal_buffers parameter.

How about the following comments?

'Total number of times WAL data was written to the disk because WAL
buffers got full
when to initialize a new WAL page'

Regards,
--
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2020-11-16 09:27:52 Heads-up: macOS Big Sur upgrade breaks EDB PostgreSQL installations
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-11-16 09:19:41 Re: Move OpenSSL random under USE_OPENSSL_RANDOM