| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: EINTR in ftruncate() |
| Date: | 2022-07-15 13:28:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3353397.1657891705@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:34 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> (Someday we oughta go ahead and make our Windows signal API look more
>> like POSIX, as I suggested back in 2015. I'm still not taking
>> point on that, though.)
> For the sigprocmask() part, here's a patch that passes CI. Only the
> SIG_SETMASK case is actually exercised by our current code, though.
Passes an eyeball check, but I can't actually test it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Japin Li | 2022-07-15 13:29:20 | Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level |
| Previous Message | Japin Li | 2022-07-15 13:23:02 | Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level |