| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: EINTR in ftruncate() |
| Date: | 2022-07-16 05:18:25 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGK5ax1AoFMvXksLROrxwB1=-EsT=7+6oUtCn47GbC9zjA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 1:28 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:34 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> (Someday we oughta go ahead and make our Windows signal API look more
> >> like POSIX, as I suggested back in 2015. I'm still not taking
> >> point on that, though.)
>
> > For the sigprocmask() part, here's a patch that passes CI. Only the
> > SIG_SETMASK case is actually exercised by our current code, though.
>
> Passes an eyeball check, but I can't actually test it.
Thanks. Pushed.
I'm not brave enough to try to write a replacement sigaction() yet,
but it does appear that we could rip more ugliness and inconsistencies
that way, eg sa_mask.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2022-07-16 05:43:39 | Re: Improving scalability of Parallel Bitmap Heap/Index Scan |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2022-07-16 04:59:11 | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |