Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations

> On Mar 17, 2020, at 11:49 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2020-03-16 16:03:51 -0700, Mark Dilger wrote:
>> While working on object access hooks, I noticed several locations
>> where I would expect the hook to be invoked, but no actual invocation.
>> I think this just barely qualifies as a bug. It's debatable because
>> whether it is a bug depends on the user's expectations and whether not
>> invoking the hook in these cases is defensible. Does anybody have any
>> recollection of an intentional choice not to invoke in these
>> locations?
>
> I am strongly against treating this as a bug, which'd likely imply
> backpatching. New hook invocations are a noticable behavioural change,
> and very plausibly will break currently working extensions. That's fine
> for a major version upgrade, but not for a minor one, unless there are
> very good reasons.

I agree that this does not need to be back-patched. I was debating whether it constitutes a bug for the purpose of putting the fix into v13 vs. punting the patch forward to the v14 cycle. I don't have a strong opinion on that.

Thoughts?

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company