Re: has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo
Date: 2017-11-23 15:16:35
Message-ID: 328dc32c-2231-cde4-1e29-82f1b59c6de3@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/22/17 22:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> I just noticed that has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo about
>> "WITH GRANT OPTION". Any objections to the attached going back to all
>> supported versions?
>
> That looks odd. Patch certainly makes this case consistent with the
> rest of acl.c, but maybe there's some deeper reason? Peter?

No I think it was just forgotten.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2017-11-23 15:21:33 Re: documentation is now XML
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-23 15:06:56 Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures