Re: has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo
Date: 2017-11-23 03:58:05
Message-ID: 1610.1511409485@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I just noticed that has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo about
> "WITH GRANT OPTION". Any objections to the attached going back to all
> supported versions?

That looks odd. Patch certainly makes this case consistent with the
rest of acl.c, but maybe there's some deeper reason? Peter?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message amul sul 2017-11-23 04:15:08 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-23 02:08:39 Re: Allowing SSL connection of v11 client to v10 server with SCRAM channel binding