Re: has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo
Date: 2017-11-26 17:53:14
Message-ID: e621ee68-7018-3f0c-1dd6-ff8dfc60f52c@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/23/2017 07:16 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 11/22/17 22:58, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>> I just noticed that has_sequence_privilege() never got the memo about
>>> "WITH GRANT OPTION". Any objections to the attached going back to all
>>> supported versions?
>>
>> That looks odd. Patch certainly makes this case consistent with the
>> rest of acl.c, but maybe there's some deeper reason? Peter?
>
> No I think it was just forgotten.

Pushed.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2017-11-26 18:07:24 Memory error in src/backend/replication/logical/origin.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-26 17:49:53 Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums