Re: automatically generating node support functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: automatically generating node support functions
Date: 2022-03-25 13:32:44
Message-ID: 3236082.1648215164@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 24.03.22 22:57, David Rowley wrote:
>> Also, I'm quite keen to see this work make it into v15. Do you think
>> you'll get time to do that? Thanks for working on it.

> My thinking right now is to wait for the PG16 branch to open and then
> consider putting it in early.

+1. However, as noted by David (and I think I made similar points awhile
ago), the patch could still use a lot of mop-up work. It'd be prudent to
continue working on it so it will actually be ready to go when the branch
is made.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Japin Li 2022-03-25 13:35:42 Re: pg_relation_size on partitioned table
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-25 13:28:58 Re: [PATCH] pg_statio_all_tables: several rows per table due to invalid TOAST index