| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: automatically generating node support functions |
| Date: | 2022-03-25 15:20:05 |
| Message-ID: | 487a96ce-9a5e-d89c-b1e7-c3a8285d8b15@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25.03.22 14:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 24.03.22 22:57, David Rowley wrote:
>>> Also, I'm quite keen to see this work make it into v15. Do you think
>>> you'll get time to do that? Thanks for working on it.
>
>> My thinking right now is to wait for the PG16 branch to open and then
>> consider putting it in early.
>
> +1. However, as noted by David (and I think I made similar points awhile
> ago), the patch could still use a lot of mop-up work. It'd be prudent to
> continue working on it so it will actually be ready to go when the branch
> is made.
The v5 patch was intended to address all the comments you made in your
Feb. 14 mail. I'm not aware of any open issues from that.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-03-25 15:27:42 | Re: pg_relation_size on partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-03-25 15:09:20 | Re: Use JOIN USING aliases in ruleutils.c |