From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date |
Date: | 2021-02-19 14:57:22 |
Message-ID: | 3026887.1613746642@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 02:21:21AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1, but I think the first period in this comment is redundant:
>> + AC_DEFINE([USE_OPENSSL], 1, [Define to 1 to build with OpenSSL support. (--with-ssl=openssl).])
> I guess that you mean the second period here to be more consistent
> with the others? That would mean the following diff:
> + AC_DEFINE([USE_OPENSSL], 1, [Define to 1 to build with OpenSSL support. (--with-ssl=openssl)])
Hm. It should be consistent with the rest, for sure. Personally I'd put
the only period at the end, but I suppose we should stick with the
prevailing style if there is one.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2021-02-19 15:13:36 | Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-02-19 14:54:34 | Re: Finding cause of test fails on the cfbot site |