Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date
Date: 2021-02-20 01:20:26
Message-ID: YDBj2ro+D2uRKwQc@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 09:57:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm. It should be consistent with the rest, for sure. Personally I'd put
> the only period at the end, but I suppose we should stick with the
> prevailing style if there is one.

Thanks. I have just used the same style as XML, LDAP and LLVM then.
Thanks Antonin for the report.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-02-20 01:36:55 Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2021-02-20 00:23:28 Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq