Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date
Date: 2021-02-19 07:34:41
Message-ID: YC9qEd+zlRBItIyc@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 02:21:21AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> > Indeed, thanks. It looks like a "git add" that was fat-fingered. I
> > would like to make things more consistent with the attached.
>
> +1, but I think the first period in this comment is redundant:
>
> + AC_DEFINE([USE_OPENSSL], 1, [Define to 1 to build with OpenSSL support. (--with-ssl=openssl).])

I guess that you mean the second period here to be more consistent
with the others? That would mean the following diff:
+ AC_DEFINE([USE_OPENSSL], 1, [Define to 1 to build with OpenSSL support. (--with-ssl=openssl)])
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2021-02-19 07:37:07 Re: Tid scan improvements
Previous Message Amit Langote 2021-02-19 07:30:46 Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers