| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Potential bug in pg_dump ... |
| Date: | 2001-12-17 21:25:21 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20011218082521.039ccd40@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 14:10 17/12/01 -0500, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>Got a report the other day of a "problem" with pg_dump where, if in the
>middle of a dump, someone happens to drop a table, it errors out with:
>
pg_dump runs in a single TX, which should mean that metadata changes in
another process won't affect it. Have I misunderstood the way PG handles
metadata changes?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-12-17 21:36:19 | Re: PG 7.2b4 bug? |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2001-12-17 21:16:40 | Re: PG 7.2b4 bug? |