Re: Potential bug in pg_dump ...

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> At 14:10 17/12/01 -0500, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> Got a report the other day of a "problem" with pg_dump where, if in the
>> middle of a dump, someone happens to drop a table, it errors out with:

> pg_dump runs in a single TX, which should mean that metadata changes in
> another process won't affect it. Have I misunderstood the way PG handles
> metadata changes?

In the case Marc is describing, pg_dump hasn't yet tried to touch the
table that someone else is dropping, so it has no lock on the table,
so the drop is allowed to occur.

A possible (partial) solution is for pg_dump to obtain a read-lock on
every table in the database as soon as it sees the table mentioned in
pg_class, rather than waiting till it's ready to read the contents of
the table. However this cure might be worse than the disease,
particularly for people running "pg_dump -t table".

regards, tom lane