| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules |
| Date: | 2000-09-26 16:13:24 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.5.32.20000927021324.02e2e300@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:54 26/09/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>Comments? Is this a general enough mechanism, and does it fit well
>with the various setUID tricks that people are thinking about?
>
Didn't Peter & Jan have a rewrite of the permissions system in the pipeline
- or has that disappeared? What Jan was proposing was rather more
substantial than just the setuid stuff, I *think*.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pgsql-bugs | 2000-09-26 16:29:58 | 7.0.2 source rpm failed to compile |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-09-26 15:00:33 | New mod_php3 RPMs for Mandrake |