| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules |
| Date: | 2000-09-27 10:42:15 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.21.0009262329330.515-100000@peter |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner writes:
> Didn't Peter & Jan have a rewrite of the permissions system in the pipeline
> - or has that disappeared? What Jan was proposing was rather more
> substantial than just the setuid stuff, I *think*.
If I had known that we wouldn't beta until October I probably would have
started on it. But there's a technical incompatibility issue at the core
of my idea that would have forced a postpone until 7.2 for some parts
anyway.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-09-27 10:43:23 | Installation layout is still hazardous for shared prefixes |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-09-27 10:41:52 | Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules |