Re: page macros cleanup

From: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Zdenek Kotala" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: page macros cleanup
Date: 2008-07-04 09:03:41
Message-ID: 2e78013d0807040203m268ae3a7kdbe65a9695aa7365@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com> wrote:
> Patch
> modifies HashMaxItemSize. It should require reindex on all hash indexes.
> Should we bump catalog version?
>

Do we really need that ? Even if the new HashMaxItemSize comes out to
be lower than the current limit (because of MAXALIGN), I don't see how
existing hash indexes can have a larger item than the new limit.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-04 09:05:35 Re: variadic function support
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-04 08:56:54 Re: Relation forks & FSM rewrite patches