Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more
Date: 2016-08-26 17:10:38
Message-ID: 29942.1472231438@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> Yeah, they want people to move to their own SSL library [1].

> [1] I couldn't find any official statement, but lots of blog posts
> saying the same thing.

As I recall, the deprecation warning messages said that in so many words.
That probably counts as an official statement ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-08-26 17:15:50 Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice()
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2016-08-26 17:05:45 Re: PG_DIAG_SEVERITY and a possible bug in pq_parse_errornotice()