Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16
Date: 2023-05-21 17:20:01
Message-ID: 277891.1684689601@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Fixed.

v2 looks good to me, except the documentation wording for --with-role
is needlessly inconsistent with --with-admin. The --with-admin
wording looks better, so I suggest

- Indicates the specified existing role should be automatically
+ Specifies an existing role that will be automatically
added as a member of the new role. Multiple existing roles can

> How do folks feel about keeping --role undocumented? Should we give it a
> mention in the docs for --member-of?

I'm okay with leaving it undocumented, but I won't fight about it
if somebody wants to argue for the other.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2023-05-21 18:46:56 Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready
Previous Message Anton Kirilov 2023-05-21 17:17:18 Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq