Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready
Date: 2023-05-21 18:46:56
Message-ID: 13d28e05-07a0-74c4-a011-f3f482019888@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/21/23 1:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:

>
> Looking through the release notes, I didn't see an entry for
>
> commit c6e0fe1f2a08505544c410f613839664eea9eb21
> Author: David Rowley <drowley(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Date: 2022-08-29 17:15:00 +1200
>
> Improve performance of and reduce overheads of memory management
>
> even though I think that's one of the more impactful improvements. What was
> the reason for leaving that out?

IIUC in[1], would this "just speed up" read-heavy workloads?

Thanks,

Jonathan

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvpjauCRXcgcaL6%2Be3eqecEHoeRm9D-kcbuvBitgPnW%3Dvw%40mail.gmail.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2023-05-21 19:04:58 Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-05-21 17:20:01 Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16