From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16 |
Date: | 2023-05-21 19:16:58 |
Message-ID: | 20230521191658.GA4052231@nathanxps13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 01:20:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Fixed.
>
> v2 looks good to me, except the documentation wording for --with-role
> is needlessly inconsistent with --with-admin. The --with-admin
> wording looks better, so I suggest
>
> - Indicates the specified existing role should be automatically
> + Specifies an existing role that will be automatically
> added as a member of the new role. Multiple existing roles can
Will do.
>> How do folks feel about keeping --role undocumented? Should we give it a
>> mention in the docs for --member-of?
>
> I'm okay with leaving it undocumented, but I won't fight about it
> if somebody wants to argue for the other.
Alright. Barring any additional feedback, I'll commit this tonight.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-05-21 19:24:31 | Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready |
Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2023-05-21 19:04:58 | Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready |