Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, "'Marc G(dot) Fournier'" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Tatsuo Ishii'" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, snaga(at)snaga(dot)org, austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com, pgsql-hackers-pitr(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
Date: 2004-02-13 04:35:03
Message-ID: 27547.1076646903@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr

Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> Tom recently posted the PITR patch to PATCHES - maybe we should sent it
> to this list too. That might kick start the discussion...

Actually, I tried to send it here first. This list bounced it because
it was over 40K (which I think is the standard limit for all the lists
except PATCHES). So, if you want to look at it, go look in the PATCHES
archives:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-02/msg00134.php

(BTW, Marc, I still don't see an entry for the -pitr list at
http://archives.postgresql.org/ ...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-13 04:35:48 Re: Transaction aborts on syntax error.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-02-13 04:25:36 Re: 7.4 - FK constraint performance

Browse pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-02-13 04:37:32 Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-02-13 04:29:28 Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch