Quick Links

Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?

From:	Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To:	Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:	simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, "'Marc G(dot) Fournier'" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 'Tatsuo Ishii' <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, snaga(at)snaga(dot)org, austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com, pgsql-hackers-pitr(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
Date:	2004-02-12 23:16:41
Message-ID:	402C0959.5040304@paradise.net.nz
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr

Tom recently posted the PITR patch to PATCHES - maybe we should sent it
to this list too. That might kick start the discussion...

regards

Mark

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
>No one has said anything on the list yet. :-)
>
>
>

In response to

Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? at 2004-02-10 21:50:49 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? at 2004-02-13 04:35:03 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	markw	2004-02-12 23:50:33	Re: Proposed Query Planner TODO items
Previous Message	Simon Riggs	2004-02-12 22:56:00	Re: Transaction aborts on syntax error.

Browse pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Simon Riggs	2004-02-12 23:59:43	Proposals for PITR
Previous Message	Bruce Momjian	2004-02-12 20:18:42	Re: PITR Dead horse?