Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X

From: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>
To: Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X
Date: 2019-03-05 07:42:47
Message-ID: 268361551771767@myt6-fe24916a5562.qloud-c.yandex.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hi

seems this is unpackaged extension, usually installed prior 9.1 release. Maybe reorg even does not support "create extension" syntax. That was long ago and project homepage is unavailable now. pg_repack documentation mention "support for PostgreSQL 9.2 and EXTENSION packaging" as improvements.

> Are these functions seeded ( default) one ?

No its not default.

regards, Sergei

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arthur Zakirov 2019-03-05 10:30:18 Re: query logging of prepared statements
Previous Message Julie Nishimura 2019-03-05 03:11:23 Re: master-> 2 hot standbys

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2019-03-05 07:57:25 Re: Re: \describe*
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-03-05 07:41:35 Re: psql show URL with help