Re: Re: \describe*

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: \describe*
Date: 2019-03-05 07:57:25
Message-ID: 26179681-9bce-7965-6ea4-610060be5dbf@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/25/19 9:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 7:19 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> Sure, but it was late, and we have far more patches than we can deal
>> with. Many of them much much older than this.
>
> More importantly, at least in my opinion, is that this is one of those
> questions that people tend to have very strong feelings about. Doing
> something at the last minute risks people not feeling that they had an
> adequate time to express those feelings before something got shipped.
> Not everybody reads this list every day, or tests every new commit as
> soon as it goes into the tree.

I agree with Andres and Robert. This patch should be pushed to PG13.

I'll do that on March 8 unless there is a compelling argument not to.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2019-03-05 08:00:43 Re: Question about commit 11cf92f6e2e13c0a6e3f98be3e629e6bd90b74d5
Previous Message Sergei Kornilov 2019-03-05 07:42:47 Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X