Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: wjzeng <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Cc: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia(at)taobao(dot)com>, "Cai, Le" <le(dot)cai(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong(dot)xsc(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-03-26 04:34:01
Message-ID: CANEvxPpAxb30mnWdp4YZvwFF28A3zf3LCuEg91BE1djRTYSZcg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Sorry, I introduced this bug in my refactoring.
> It's been fixed.
>
> Wenjing
>
> Hi Wenjing,
This patch(gtt_v21_pg13.patch) is not applicable on PG HEAD, I hope you
have prepared the patch on top of some previous commit.
Could you please rebase the patch which we can apply on HEAD ?

--

With Regards,
Prabhat Kumar Sahu
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-03-26 04:41:15 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-03-26 04:20:53 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number